Quantcast
Channel: Some King's Kent
Viewing all 115 articles
Browse latest View live

Jaquay's Night of the Walking Wet - My Reformatting

$
0
0

I reformatted Paul Jaquay's 'Night of the Walking Wet' some while ago now for both AD&D-A4 and OD&D-A5 sizes, as the original Judges Guild presentation was almost unreadable. Some of you have it already; I'm making it more widely available.




00---==---==---00

Be Brave -- Pretend You Read !!

$
0
0

25Shakespeare
24
23
22Homer
21Dante
20
19CervantesMontaigne
18Joyce  Wordsworth  Chaucer  Dostoevsky  Nietzsche  Herodotus Thucydides
17YeatsOvid
16ER EddisonKafkaBeckett
15AustenTolstoy
14WH Hodgson   JR Tolkien   Conrad   Orwell   Nabokov   Hughes
13W MorrisDickensE Dickinson
12JK Jerome
11G Wolfe   J Vance   C Maturin   J Hogg   R Stone   J Jones
10CA SmithPG Wodehouse
  9F LeiberDunsanyR Chandler
  8RE Howard    HP Lovecraft    HG Wells
  7AC Doyle
  6
  5
  4
  3
  2J GrishamG Martin
  1All women writers*Writers of self help or business leadership books
  0All RPG writers, bloggers and forum bores**

*except Austen & Dickinson
**with no exceptions


==
==

There is much to discuss here, for example Harold Lamb is fascinating and hoists RE Howard up by association. Make the argument! Fritz Leiber's extraordinary 'Adept's Gambit' is worthy of a 13-14 rank surely?

There must be fluidity in the rankings. One of my favourite attempts to rank rock music is George Starostin's. Bands are ranked from 1-5 and albums from 1-10 and he makes a sum of these.

My understanding is that OSR gamers are poorly read when compared with the average population, even in the field of fantasy, this I have learned from reading blogs and the OSR forums. Prove me wrong, show some kind of knowledge! I expect you haven't read anyone above rank 14 cover to cover, and probably only Tolkien above rank 9. That should give you pause to be silent, to stop posting your thoughts until you have read more widely, no?

==
=

Article 0

Author Timeline PDF

$
0
0

Here is the full PDF of this timeline I made for writers of the fantastical I care about.

The background image is one I made for Empty Planet.

====

Meanwhile I am thinking about Aione and thanks to Scott-of-the-many-settings may make a separate setting-blog purely for Aione if I feel I can sustain an interest in D&D sufficient to oppose my contempt for D&Ders.



====
==

Seven Days of Seven Attractive Book Objects

$
0
0
From tomorrow I will post once each day for one week pictures from a book I recommend in an attractive and yet cheap edition, particularly if you live in the US. If you want to influence which book I choose then make a comment.

What I will do is add any request to what I intend to post on a given day.

Tomorrow: Strange Case of Dr. Jeckyll and Mr. Hyde.

====
==

Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

$
0
0
==
Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894) had published his novella Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in 1886. He is a curious example of a writer whose literary credibility waned during the twentieth century only to be restored in the last decade or so. On any page the deliberateness of his thought is evident, he is concise and poetic when the moment carries him as when he describes the wet and foggy empty city at night. For the Strange Case he concocted a precarious or let's say an intricate structure which engulfs the reader in mystery before leading him through a lumpen narrative exposing the truth in stages. For two thirds of the tale Jekyll is a character only glimpsed, literally once through a window. He is not present. The final third comprises two written statements ascending to a spiritual revelation scented with hocus pocus in a scientific habit.

My guess is that most people are familiar with the story from the rather brilliant 1931 film Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde directed by Mamoulian starring Fredric March. While this film is technically daring and innovative as a motion picture thenarrative unfolds straightforwardly and the focus is entirely on J&H. For this reason it would be prudent for those new to this canonical work to read it first.

Stevenson is diligent in exploring his conceit which is not as simple as a careless reading would leave one with. Jekyll admits to being uncommonly sensitive to opposing moral impulses before conducting his experiments, in fact this insight persuades him to experimentation. Stevenson continues by hinting that further research by Jekyll's successors might uncover different or a proliferation of personas. The psychic division is not black and white. Hyde is purely evil and free but Jekyll is a composite of good and evil, unhappy with this tension in his nature. Mamoulian's film suggests Jekyll's motivation is scientific understanding or ambition which is a typical interpretation but as I see it his motive was personal and selfish; he wanted to experience guiltless licentiousness. Anyway it's a great work, read it.

==

If anyone wants me to present a canonical work in these seven days let me know by naming a work you pretend to be interested in..

==

And don't forget to hit the like button if you want me to fuck your wife or girlfriend.

==

[This Limited Editions Club edition from 1952 is 12" tall]









====
==

Tolkien's Letters - English Twit

$
0
0

Reading the 1981 book of Tolkien's Letters I have formed a view of Tolkien as a narrow minded and tiresome know-it-all, which is disappointing. I have always considered him an imaginative writer, not one with poetic or literary skill, but someone who had absorbed enough of Wordsworth to write a pastoral, who loved life enough for the reader to relish his descriptions of everyday things and with an imagination deep enough to keep bright the wonder in a fairy story for a very long span. I will resist this new insight into his character affecting my opinion of his work but from past experience it might do.

From the letters, as a reminder for those who have read the collection and not as an argument, some examples are his condescending, almost sneering, remarks about 'jive music' and 'jam sessions' which he must have picked up overhearing US troops in a pub. A piano is for playing Chopin on, he says. I am quite sure he knew as much about Chopin as Duke Ellington. He loves England but not Great Britain or, shudder, the wider Commonwealth. He hates Celtic myth. He also reveals a remarkable ignorance when it comes to ancient Greece from which I infer his Anglo-Saxon world of study was looked down on (in the manner of Oxford profs) but which doesn't excuse his distaste for and schoolboy understanding of Greek culture. He is always right, I have never met a deeply religious person who was not always right, Chaucer is not the father of English Literature because, again, JRRT is studying Anglo-Saxon authors who preceded Chaucer.

He is not a bad person; snobs are more usually daft. There is an interesting letter to the German publishing firm, about to translate the Hobbit in 1938, who have asked him if he is of 'Aryan extraction', and to which 'impertinent and irrelevant inquiry' he replies with perception, explicitly praising the 'gifted' Jewish race.

In contrast and as an antidote, here is a 1 hr interview with GRR Martin, an author whose prose I can't digest, where he comes across as a down to earth, not particularly learned, old guy I would love to hang out with in a bar. Not so Tolkien. If I heard him chatting with his cronies in a tucked away English pub I would not enjoy my beer until the moment in the evening I had him trembling in rage.

====
==

The Worst Blog Ever


Aione Blog Up

$
0
0
==

My Aione blog link is below. I won't be making any jokes there but some of you still might want to follow along as I make stuff up about the Aione caverns.

==>>    a gods glass eye



====
==

New Post on Aione Blog

A Swift Improvement to Vance's Lyonesse Map

$
0
0


The map is hard to take in at a glance in the original black and white so the photo demonstrates how it can look with 60 seconds touching up. Im going to properly scan the coloured map and paste it to the inside of the boards of the three volumes.

====
==

Tolkien's Letters - English Twit

$
0
0

Reading the 1981 book of Tolkien's Letters I have formed a view of Tolkien as a narrow minded and tiresome know-it-all, which is disappointing. I have always considered him an imaginative writer, not one with poetic or literary skill, but someone who had absorbed enough of Wordsworth to write a pastoral, who loved life enough for the reader to relish his descriptions of everyday things and with an imagination deep enough to keep bright the wonder in a fairy story for a very long span. I will resist this new insight into his character affecting my opinion of his work but from past experience it might do.

From the letters, as a reminder for those who have read the collection and not as an argument, some examples are his condescending, almost sneering, remarks about 'jive music' and 'jam sessions' which he must have picked up overhearing US troops in a pub. A piano is for playing Chopin on, he says. I am quite sure he knew as much about Chopin as Duke Ellington. He loves England but not Great Britain or, shudder, the wider Commonwealth. He hates Celtic myth. He also reveals a remarkable ignorance when it comes to ancient Greece from which I infer his Anglo-Saxon world of study was looked down on (in the manner of Oxford profs) but which doesn't excuse his distaste for and schoolboy understanding of Greek culture. He is always right, I have never met a deeply religious person who was not always right, Chaucer is not the father of English Literature because, again, JRRT is studying Anglo-Saxon authors who preceded Chaucer.

He is not a bad person; snobs are more usually daft. There is an interesting letter to the German publishing firm, about to translate the Hobbit in 1938, who have asked him if he is of 'Aryan extraction', and to which 'impertinent and irrelevant inquiry' he replies with perception, explicitly praising the 'gifted' Jewish race.

In contrast and as an antidote, here is a 1 hr interview with GRR Martin, an author whose prose I can't digest, where he comes across as a down to earth, not particularly learned, old guy I would love to hang out with in a bar. Not so Tolkien. If I heard him chatting with his cronies in a tucked away English pub I would not enjoy my beer until the moment in the evening I had him trembling in rage.

====
==

AD&D Thief Climbing Distances for a Given Risk - (By The Book)

$
0
0


The tactical considerations arising from AD&D concepts such as movement, encounter distance, surprise and initiative, when enriched with the advantages accorded to the Ranger, Thief and Assassin and my own stealth and special forces classes, have always closely engaged my players over the years. Since we all come form a Science or Maths background nothing in gaming is considered complicated.

I have been thinking about how a Thief might appraise the risk involved in climbing and think it is reasonable he might categorise an entire climb for himself as say Comfortable, Cautious or Reckless with probabilities of success of say, 95%, 85% and 50%. The exact numbers are irrelevant; it is the approach that is important. Then according to both his level and the conditions of the surface there is a distance he could cover at that level of risk following the descriptions in the PHB and the DMG. I have simply transferred a per round risk to a distance covered at a risk, for example in the table the risk for all kinds of conditions and experience is cautious 85%. I also have tables for 50% and 95%.

This, at least to me, is a more natural and realistic way for climbers to get to grips with hazard. The distances and probabilities are all by the book.

====
==

Map of Middle-earth on a Judges Guild Wilderlands Sheet

$
0
0


I have completed my second map of a suite of six on blank Judges Guild Hex sheets. Four are for my African setting and two for Middle-earth.

The six maps are:
  1. Affryqq (for my Fantasy Africa campaign)
  2. Middle-earth (above)
  3. Naqada (Egypt following the Nile)
  4. Beleriand
  5. The whole of Eastern Affryqq including Zanzibar& Napalatine
  6. A small region of Eastern Affryqq beyond the White Coast including Witchland, The Voidmark, Mount Zumzun, Bluestone the Isle of the Dead & Lake Nyangwe

I am particularly keen now that I have finished the standard third age LotR map, with the exception of placenames which I am reticent to include, to get on with my Beleriand map which will accompany another reading of The Children of Hurin, my favourite of Tolkien's works. Rather than the familiar map of Beleriand I will be working from this one below which has more information. I will include placenames for Beleriand as I am less familiar with this land and the places there still fill me with wonder.


Revisiting the Concept of Magic

$
0
0
I am presenting the core magical concept again because I hope to go further soon with an example of a non player character from the campaign, probably a general magic user. I am not fully sure how to provide insight into an idea which is integrated into the campaign but I'll try something. The symbols for the kinds of magic user are new, I expect you can see what Ive done and how I can quickly create a representative symbol for as yet undetermined professions and that these might even be identifiable by a player with some thought. The third page is also new.

As an exercise, if you conceive of different pattern for the broad concept of priest, let's hear it. Or, what magical classes can you conceive of using the symbols? Warlock?



====
==

Viewing all 115 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images